Immigrants from Bolivia vs Burmese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Burmese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Burmese
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Burmese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,688,041 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,653,022 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 3.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Burmese |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 22.9% | 23.5% |
| Range | 20.9% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 8.2% |
| Median | 7.3% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia and Burmese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.79%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Danish (9.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Korea (9.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Greek (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Eastern European (9.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and Swedish (9.6%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |