Immigrants from Bolivia vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Immigrants from North Macedonia
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,688,041 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,289,354 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.300 and weighted average of 9.4%, a difference of 0.50%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Immigrants from North Macedonia |
Minimum | 2.0% | 0.15% |
Maximum | 22.9% | 17.7% |
Range | 20.9% | 17.6% |
Mean | 8.3% | 7.9% |
Median | 7.3% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 10.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia and Immigrants from North Macedonia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.69%), Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (9.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia are Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.56%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.94%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |