Hawaiian vs Albanian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Hawaiian
Albanian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Hawaiians
Albanians
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
62.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
77.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hawaiian vs Albanian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,605,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,950,147 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Albanians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 2.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hawaiian | Albanian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.48% |
| Maximum | 27.3% | 10.5% |
| Range | 26.0% | 10.0% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 4.7% |
| Median | 5.0% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Hawaiians and Albanians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Paraguayan (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Costa Rican (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Sierra Leonean (5.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Albanians are Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
| Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
| Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
| Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
| Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
| Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
| Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
| Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |