Hawaiian vs Ottawa Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Hawaiian
Ottawa
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Hawaiians
Ottawa
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
62.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
54.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hawaiian vs Ottawa Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,605,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,836,436 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.95%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hawaiian | Ottawa |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 27.3% | 11.5% |
Range | 26.0% | 10.0% |
Mean | 6.1% | 5.5% |
Median | 5.0% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Hawaiians and Ottawa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Paraguayan (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Costa Rican (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Sierra Leonean (5.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Bermudan (5.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and Alsatian (5.2%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |
Marshallese | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 5.2% |
Menominee | 47.8 /100 | #176 | Average 5.2% |