Scottish vs Immigrants from South Africa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Scottish
Immigrants from South Africa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Scottish
Immigrants from South Africa
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs Immigrants from South Africa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 565,877,668 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.669 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,245,302 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 0.66%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scottish | Immigrants from South Africa |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 0.91% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 44.9% |
| Range | 96.5% | 44.0% |
| Mean | 23.6% | 11.5% |
| Median | 13.6% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.8% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.1% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.5% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.4% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish and Immigrants from South Africa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Laotian (12.6%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |