Irish vs English Female Poverty
COMPARE
Irish
English
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Irish
English
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Irish vs English Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,836,064 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Irish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,145,061 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.29%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Irish | English |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 72.5% |
| Range | 97.7% | 72.2% |
| Mean | 23.1% | 17.3% |
| Median | 12.6% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.0% | 19.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.6% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.9% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.8% | 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Irish and English by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Irish are Dutch (12.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Okinawan (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Finnish (12.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from England (12.3%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to English are Finnish (12.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Okinawan (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Czechoslovakian (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |