Cypriot vs Zimbabwean Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cypriot
Zimbabwean
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Cypriots
Zimbabweans
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cypriot vs Zimbabwean Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,691,047 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.422 and weighted average of 4.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,119,087 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 1.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cypriot | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 0.39% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 7.7% | 6.9% |
| Range | 7.3% | 5.9% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 3.4% |
| Median | 2.7% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.2% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Cypriots and Zimbabweans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Danish (4.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Scandinavian (4.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Scotland (4.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Taiwan (4.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Finnish (4.2%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.37%), Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Estonians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Greeks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Irish | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.2% |