British vs Zimbabwean Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
British
Zimbabwean
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
British
Zimbabweans
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Zimbabwean Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 521,525,466 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,119,087 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 5.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 6.9% |
Range | 47.6% | 5.9% |
Mean | 11.5% | 3.4% |
Median | 7.3% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 4.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to British by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Serbian (4.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.2% |
French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.37%), Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |