Liberian vs Zimbabwean Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Liberian
Zimbabwean
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Liberians
Zimbabweans
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Liberian vs Zimbabwean Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,684,322 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,119,087 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 31.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Liberian | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 0.41% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 18.2% | 6.9% |
Range | 17.8% | 5.9% |
Mean | 5.4% | 3.4% |
Median | 5.2% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 4.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Liberians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Immigrants from Belarus (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Spaniard (5.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from the Azores (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Ugandans | 31.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 30.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 30.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
Malaysians | 29.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.37%), Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |