Chickasaw vs Salvadoran Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Salvadoran
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Chickasaw
Salvadorans
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
91.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Salvadoran Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,666,878 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,635,683 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.245 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 50.3%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Salvadoran |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 51.4% | 18.5% |
| Range | 49.5% | 14.8% |
| Mean | 23.7% | 9.9% |
| Median | 21.4% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.1% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.8% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Immigrants from Costa Rica (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Greek (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Costa Rican (10.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants (10.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Ecuadorians | 93.1 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 93.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 92.8 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 92.5 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 92.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 92.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 92.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Salvadorans | 91.9 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 91.7 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 91.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 91.3 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Australians | 90.7 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 90.6 /100 | #142 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 89.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.8% |