Chickasaw vs Inupiat In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Inupiat
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Chickasaw
Inupiat
80.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Inupiat In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,707,163 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100 and weighted average of 80.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,340,693 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171 and weighted average of 80.9%, a difference of 0.050%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Inupiat |
| Minimum | 39.0% | 48.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 61.0% | 51.9% |
| Mean | 77.5% | 79.3% |
| Median | 78.4% | 81.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 73.9% | 70.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.9% | 85.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 13.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 12.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Inupiat by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Puerto Rican (80.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Paiute (80.6%, a difference of 0.35%), Yaqui (80.5%, a difference of 0.46%), Choctaw (80.5%, a difference of 0.47%), and Alaskan Athabascan (81.3%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Puerto Rican (80.7%, a difference of 0.33%), Paiute (80.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Alaskan Athabascan (81.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Yaqui (80.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and Choctaw (80.5%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.0% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 81.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.5% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.3% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 80.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 80.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 80.7% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 80.6% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 80.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 80.5% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |