Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-couple Households

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,387,032 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.425 and weighted average of 46.9%, a difference of 2.2%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chickasaw	Immigrants from Oceania
Minimum	20.0%	8.8%
Maximum	65.4%	84.0%
Range	45.4%	75.2%
Mean	47.8%	45.7%
Median	48.9%	47.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	43.2%	41.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	53.2%	51.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.0%	9.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.7%	13.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.6%	13.4%

Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
South American Indians	28.4 /100 \| #188	Fair 46.0%
Immigrants \| Latvia	26.9 /100 \| #189	Fair 46.0%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	25.6 /100 \| #190	Fair 46.0%
Choctaw	24.9 /100 \| #191	Fair 46.0%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	24.6 /100 \| #192	Fair 46.0%
Taiwanese	23.4 /100 \| #193	Fair 45.9%
Mexican American Indians	23.3 /100 \| #194	Fair 45.9%
Chickasaw	22.7 /100 \| #195	Fair 45.9%
Immigrants \| South America	22.2 /100 \| #196	Fair 45.9%
Cambodians	21.3 /100 \| #197	Fair 45.9%
Ottawa	19.4 /100 \| #198	Poor 45.8%
Carpatho Rusyns	15.7 /100 \| #199	Poor 45.7%
Potawatomi	15.6 /100 \| #200	Poor 45.7%
Immigrants \| Serbia	15.2 /100 \| #201	Poor 45.7%
Immigrants \| Central America	14.2 /100 \| #202	Poor 45.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Armenian (46.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Asia (46.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Arab (46.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Hmong (47.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Serbian (47.0%, a difference of 0.080%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
Immigrants \| Russia	77.6 /100 \| #150	Good 47.0%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	76.8 /100 \| #151	Good 47.0%
Serbians	76.3 /100 \| #152	Good 47.0%
Hmong	76.2 /100 \| #153	Good 47.0%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	76.1 /100 \| #154	Good 46.9%
Arabs	76.0 /100 \| #155	Good 46.9%
Armenians	75.4 /100 \| #156	Good 46.9%
Immigrants \| Oceania	74.8 /100 \| #157	Good 46.9%
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	73.3 /100 \| #158	Good 46.9%
Osage	73.2 /100 \| #159	Good 46.9%
Iraqis	71.7 /100 \| #160	Good 46.9%
Delaware	71.2 /100 \| #161	Good 46.8%
Colombians	71.0 /100 \| #162	Good 46.8%
Immigrants \| Turkey	70.2 /100 \| #163	Good 46.8%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	70.0 /100 \| #164	Good 46.8%