Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Immigrants from Ghana
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Bangladeshis
Immigrants from Ghana
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,248,982 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,614,936 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.42%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Immigrants from Ghana |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 28.0% | 31.3% |
| Range | 25.9% | 29.3% |
| Mean | 11.3% | 11.0% |
| Median | 9.9% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Immigrants from Ghana by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Cape Verdean (10.9%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |