Cherokee vs Swiss Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Swiss
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Swiss
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Swiss Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,541,023 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,863,093 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.685 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 34.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Swiss |
Minimum | 3.4% | 0.49% |
Maximum | 54.5% | 52.4% |
Range | 51.1% | 51.9% |
Mean | 10.6% | 8.1% |
Median | 7.7% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 7.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 9.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Venezuelan (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from South America (5.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Iraq | 4.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Laos | 4.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 3.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 3.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 3.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 5.7% |
Ghanaians | 3.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.38%), Serbian (4.3%, a difference of 0.39%), British (4.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Scottish (4.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
English | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Iranians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.2% |
French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |