Cherokee vs Swiss No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Cherokee
Swiss
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Cherokee
Swiss
7.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Swiss No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 491,425,453 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,788,069 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 1.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Swiss |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 21.4% | 65.0% |
| Range | 20.3% | 62.2% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 14.0% |
| Median | 6.1% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Swiss by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Iraqi (7.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Vietnam (7.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Taiwan (7.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Malaysian (7.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Basque (7.8%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Americans | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Finns | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Malaysians | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Cherokee | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |