Central American vs Slovak Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Central American
Slovak
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Central Americans
Slovaks
20.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
281st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
75.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Slovak Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,924,631 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.463 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 387,555,709 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 27.0%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American | Slovak |
Minimum | 4.9% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 69.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 64.1% | 96.0% |
Mean | 24.6% | 26.8% |
Median | 21.7% | 18.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.5% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.2% | 29.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 15.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 21.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 21.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Liberia (20.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Zaire (20.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Barbadian (20.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Belizean (20.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and West Indian (20.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.2% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.2% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.3% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 20.3% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 20.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 20.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 20.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 20.5% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 20.5% |
Demographics Similar to Slovaks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |