Bulgarian vs Filipino Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Filipino
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Bulgarians
Filipinos
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Filipino Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,671,341 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.912 and weighted average of 4.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,645,683 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 4.0%, a difference of 1.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bulgarian | Filipino |
Minimum | 0.47% | 0.49% |
Maximum | 45.5% | 7.5% |
Range | 45.0% | 7.0% |
Mean | 4.4% | 3.7% |
Median | 3.5% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 4.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians and Filipinos by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Lithuanian (4.0%, a difference of 0.70%), Czech (4.0%, a difference of 0.88%), Slovak (4.0%, a difference of 0.92%), Polish (4.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Italian (4.0%, a difference of 0.010%), German (4.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Polish (4.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Slovak (4.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and Czech (4.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |