British vs Native/Alaskan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
British
Native/Alaskan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
British
Natives/Alaskans
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Native/Alaskan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 521,525,466 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,148,611 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.629 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 90.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | Native/Alaskan |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 35.5% |
Range | 47.6% | 34.4% |
Mean | 11.5% | 12.0% |
Median | 7.3% | 9.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 16.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to British by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Serbian (4.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.2% |
French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Paiute (8.3%, a difference of 1.3%), Central American Indian (8.3%, a difference of 1.3%), Dominican (8.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Lumbee (8.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (8.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.3% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 7.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 7.4% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 7.5% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.5% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.5% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 8.2% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 8.3% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 8.3% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |