British vs Immigrants from Australia Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
British
Immigrants from Australia
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
British
Immigrants from Australia
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Immigrants from Australia Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 521,525,466 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,813,318 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 1.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | Immigrants from Australia |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 23.4% |
Range | 47.6% | 22.1% |
Mean | 11.5% | 6.0% |
Median | 7.3% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 6.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to British and Immigrants from Australia by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Serbian (4.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Okinawan (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Tlingit-Haida (4.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Sweden (4.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (4.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and Czechoslovakian (4.4%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |