Brazilian vs Syrian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Syrian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Syrians
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
82.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
71.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Syrian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,645,938 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,155,974 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.456 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.7%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Syrian |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 32.6% | 48.3% |
| Range | 30.4% | 47.3% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 10.4% |
| Median | 10.0% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Syrians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Immigrants from Germany (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Samoan (10.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Afghan (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |