Yugoslavian vs Syrian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Syrian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Syrians
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
78.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
71.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Syrian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,576,958 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,155,974 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.456 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.93%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Syrian |
| Minimum | 0.59% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 26.2% | 48.3% |
| Range | 25.6% | 47.3% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 10.4% |
| Median | 8.9% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Syrians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Immigrants from Germany (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Samoan (10.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Afghan (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |