Brazilian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Male Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Guamanian/Chamorro
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Guamanians/Chamorros
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
82.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
67.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,645,938 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,842,342 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 2.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Guamanian/Chamorro |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 0.76% |
| Maximum | 32.6% | 40.6% |
| Range | 30.4% | 39.9% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 12.3% |
| Median | 10.0% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Guamanians/Chamorros by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Venezuelan (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Venezuela (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |