Brazilian vs Immigrants from Nepal Male Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Immigrants from Nepal
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Immigrants from Nepal
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
82.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
67.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Nepal Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,645,938 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,636,323 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.146 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 2.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Immigrants from Nepal |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 32.6% | 26.3% |
| Range | 30.4% | 24.7% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 10.3% |
| Median | 10.0% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Immigrants from Nepal by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and Yugoslavian (10.8%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Venezuelan (11.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Guamanian/Chamorro (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Venezuela (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |