Brazilian vs Afghan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Afghan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Afghans
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
82.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
71.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Afghan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,645,938 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,780,421 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.137 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Afghan |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 32.6% | 26.4% |
| Range | 30.4% | 24.7% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 11.1% |
| Median | 10.0% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Afghans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Samoan (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Syrian (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |