Brazilian vs Samoan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Samoan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Samoans
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
82.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Samoan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,645,938 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,058,260 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Samoan |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 0.57% |
| Maximum | 32.6% | 37.9% |
| Range | 30.4% | 37.3% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 11.5% |
| Median | 10.0% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.1% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Samoans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Afghan (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Syrian (10.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |