Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Burmese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Burmese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Burmese
16.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Burmese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,865,263 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.338 and weighted average of 16.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,450,200 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 18.3%, a difference of 10.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Burmese |
Minimum | 2.9% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 30.8% | 43.2% |
Range | 27.8% | 41.3% |
Mean | 14.5% | 16.0% |
Median | 14.1% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 19.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Burmese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 1.7%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 2.6%), Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and Thai (17.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from China (18.1%, a difference of 0.75%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.78%), and Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |