New Zealander vs Burmese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
New Zealander
Burmese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
New Zealanders
Burmese
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
53.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Burmese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,229,490 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.505 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,450,200 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 18.3%, a difference of 14.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | New Zealander | Burmese |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 43.2% |
| Range | 96.1% | 41.3% |
| Mean | 27.1% | 16.0% |
| Median | 21.3% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.9% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.0% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.0% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.7% | 6.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |