Latvian vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income
COMPARE
Latvian
Chickasaw
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
Latvians
Chickasaw
$52,649
PER CAPITA INCOME
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
$36,475
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,728,386 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.257 and weighted average of $52,649. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475, a difference of 44.3%.
Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | $3,646 | $10,758 |
Maximum | $115,504 | $42,047 |
Range | $111,858 | $31,289 |
Mean | $51,165 | $28,009 |
Median | $52,046 | $27,826 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $36,086 | $24,362 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $65,124 | $31,977 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | $29,038 | $7,616 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | $21,773 | $5,659 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | $21,617 | $5,624 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from South Central Asia ($52,660, a difference of 0.020%), Israeli ($52,596, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Austria ($52,503, a difference of 0.28%), Turkish ($52,391, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Norway ($52,217, a difference of 0.83%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional $54,159 |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional $53,874 |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional $53,806 |
Immigrants | Denmark | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional $53,799 |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional $53,359 |
Russians | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional $53,154 |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional $52,660 |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional $52,596 |
Immigrants | Austria | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional $52,503 |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional $52,391 |
Immigrants | Norway | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional $52,217 |
Australians | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional $52,074 |
Immigrants | Russia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional $52,044 |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional $52,005 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
Inupiat | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic $36,999 |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $36,849 |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $36,823 |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $36,690 |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $36,665 |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $36,651 |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $36,631 |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic $36,475 |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic $36,427 |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic $36,180 |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic $36,112 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic $35,999 |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic $35,922 |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic $35,897 |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic $35,720 |