South African vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income
COMPARE
South African
Chickasaw
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
South Africans
Chickasaw
$50,044
PER CAPITA INCOME
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
$36,475
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,604,546 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.489 and weighted average of $50,044. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475, a difference of 37.2%.

Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Chickasaw |
Minimum | $17,364 | $10,758 |
Maximum | $88,818 | $42,047 |
Range | $71,454 | $31,289 |
Mean | $49,855 | $28,009 |
Median | $52,728 | $27,826 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $39,824 | $24,362 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $58,137 | $31,977 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | $18,313 | $7,616 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | $17,281 | $5,659 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | $16,970 | $5,624 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Asian ($50,057, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe ($50,065, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Malaysia ($49,983, a difference of 0.12%), Bhutanese ($49,894, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Scotland ($49,893, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional $50,555 |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional $50,458 |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional $50,417 |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional $50,385 |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional $50,303 |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional $50,065 |
Asians | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional $50,057 |
South Africans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional $50,044 |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional $49,983 |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional $49,894 |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional $49,893 |
Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional $49,862 |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional $49,741 |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional $49,640 |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional $49,627 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
Inupiat | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic $36,999 |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $36,849 |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $36,823 |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $36,690 |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $36,665 |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $36,651 |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $36,631 |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic $36,475 |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic $36,427 |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic $36,180 |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic $36,112 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic $35,999 |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic $35,922 |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic $35,897 |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic $35,720 |