Latvian vs Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics Latvians Chickasaw

COMPARE

Latvian

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean LaotianLatvianLebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Chickasaw

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee CheyenneChickasawChilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Householder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father Poverty Single Mother Poverty Married-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or Separated Births to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17 Disability Age 18 to 34 Disability Age 35 to 64 Disability Age 65 to 74 Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Comparison

Latvians

Chickasaw

Exceptional

10.8%

SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75

99.6/ 100

METRIC RATING

37th/ 347

METRIC RANK

11.6%

SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75

90.2/ 100

METRIC RATING

105th/ 347

METRIC RANK

Latvian vs Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,227,834 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.205 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,762,079 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 7.5%.

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Latvian	Chickasaw
Minimum	1.5%	1.7%
Maximum	62.5%	40.0%
Range	61.0%	38.3%
Mean	15.1%	14.2%
Median	10.4%	12.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.4%	9.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	16.8%	17.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.4%	7.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.7%	7.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.6%	7.7%

Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75

Demographics Similar to Latvians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75

In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Finnish (10.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Scotch-Irish (10.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Luxembourger (10.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Italian (10.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and Puget Sound Salish (10.8%, a difference of 0.65%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Swiss	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 10.7%
Marshallese	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 10.7%
British	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 10.7%
Puget Sound Salish	99.7 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 10.8%
Italians	99.7 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 10.8%
Luxembourgers	99.6 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 10.8%
Scotch-Irish	99.6 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 10.8%
Latvians	99.6 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 10.8%
Finns	99.6 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 10.8%
Czechoslovakians	99.4 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 10.9%
Thais	99.4 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 10.9%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.2 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 11.0%
Austrians	99.1 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 11.0%
Celtics	99.1 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 11.0%
Belgians	99.1 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 11.0%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75

In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Singapore (11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (11.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Guamanian/Chamorro (11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Jordanian (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Immigrants \| Japan	91.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	91.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 11.6%
Syrians	91.1 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 11.6%
Jordanians	90.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 11.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	90.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	90.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Singapore	90.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 11.6%
Chickasaw	90.2 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 11.6%
Russians	89.9 /100 \| #106	Excellent 11.6%
Immigrants \| Oceania	89.4 /100 \| #107	Excellent 11.7%
Turks	89.4 /100 \| #108	Excellent 11.7%
South Africans	89.3 /100 \| #109	Excellent 11.7%
Immigrants \| Jordan	88.7 /100 \| #110	Excellent 11.7%
Burmese	88.7 /100 \| #111	Excellent 11.7%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	88.4 /100 \| #112	Excellent 11.7%