Puerto Rican vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income
COMPARE
Puerto Rican
Chickasaw
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
Puerto Ricans
Chickasaw
$31,268
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
$36,475
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puerto Rican vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,362,553 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.690 and weighted average of $31,268. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475, a difference of 16.7%.
Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Puerto Rican | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | $4,085 | $10,758 |
| Maximum | $46,990 | $42,047 |
| Range | $42,905 | $31,289 |
| Mean | $26,618 | $28,009 |
| Median | $26,784 | $27,826 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $18,902 | $24,362 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $33,347 | $31,977 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | $14,444 | $7,616 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | $9,544 | $5,659 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | $9,511 | $5,624 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to Puerto Ricans by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Puerto Ricans are Hopi ($31,177, a difference of 0.29%), Crow ($31,729, a difference of 1.5%), Pima ($30,644, a difference of 2.0%), Pueblo ($32,012, a difference of 2.4%), and Yup'ik ($30,518, a difference of 2.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic $33,696 |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic $33,279 |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic $33,236 |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic $33,009 |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic $32,996 |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic $32,345 |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic $32,012 |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic $31,729 |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic $31,268 |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic $31,177 |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic $30,644 |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic $30,518 |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic $30,256 |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic $29,845 |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic $29,031 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Inupiat | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic $36,999 |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $36,849 |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $36,823 |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $36,690 |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $36,665 |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $36,651 |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $36,631 |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic $36,475 |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic $36,427 |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic $36,180 |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic $36,112 |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic $35,999 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic $35,922 |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic $35,897 |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic $35,720 |