Costa Rican vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Chickasaw
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
Costa Ricans
Chickasaw
$44,090
PER CAPITA INCOME
61.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
$36,475
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,595,957 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002 and weighted average of $44,090. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475, a difference of 20.9%.

Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Chickasaw |
Minimum | $9,066 | $10,758 |
Maximum | $94,709 | $42,047 |
Range | $85,643 | $31,289 |
Mean | $43,514 | $28,009 |
Median | $42,885 | $27,826 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $34,433 | $24,362 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $52,139 | $31,977 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | $17,706 | $7,616 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | $17,472 | $5,659 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | $17,321 | $5,624 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Danish ($44,095, a difference of 0.010%), Swiss ($44,076, a difference of 0.030%), South American ($44,114, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South America ($44,068, a difference of 0.050%), and Sri Lankan ($44,014, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
Portuguese | 68.7 /100 | #154 | Good $44,362 |
Uruguayans | 67.6 /100 | #155 | Good $44,318 |
Slovaks | 65.4 /100 | #156 | Good $44,229 |
South American Indians | 64.8 /100 | #157 | Good $44,206 |
Immigrants | Nepal | 64.3 /100 | #158 | Good $44,187 |
South Americans | 62.4 /100 | #159 | Good $44,114 |
Danes | 61.9 /100 | #160 | Good $44,095 |
Costa Ricans | 61.8 /100 | #161 | Good $44,090 |
Swiss | 61.4 /100 | #162 | Good $44,076 |
Immigrants | South America | 61.2 /100 | #163 | Good $44,068 |
Sri Lankans | 59.8 /100 | #164 | Average $44,014 |
Immigrants | Philippines | 59.4 /100 | #165 | Average $44,000 |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 59.3 /100 | #166 | Average $43,997 |
English | 58.9 /100 | #167 | Average $43,982 |
Belgians | 58.1 /100 | #168 | Average $43,951 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
Inupiat | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic $36,999 |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $36,849 |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $36,823 |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $36,690 |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $36,665 |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $36,651 |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $36,631 |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic $36,475 |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic $36,427 |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic $36,180 |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic $36,112 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic $35,999 |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic $35,922 |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic $35,897 |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic $35,720 |