Immigrants from Bulgaria vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bulgaria
Chickasaw
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
Immigrants from Bulgaria
Chickasaw
$49,482
PER CAPITA INCOME
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
$36,475
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bulgaria vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,552,113 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bulgaria and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.064 and weighted average of $49,482. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475, a difference of 35.7%.

Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bulgaria | Chickasaw |
Minimum | $7,295 | $10,758 |
Maximum | $82,704 | $42,047 |
Range | $75,409 | $31,289 |
Mean | $49,825 | $28,009 |
Median | $50,915 | $27,826 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $41,288 | $24,362 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $60,205 | $31,977 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | $18,917 | $7,616 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | $16,836 | $5,659 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | $16,430 | $5,624 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bulgaria by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bulgaria are Immigrants from Romania ($49,463, a difference of 0.040%), Lithuanian ($49,448, a difference of 0.070%), Bolivian ($49,526, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Canada ($49,412, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Argentina ($49,627, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional $49,894 |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional $49,893 |
Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional $49,862 |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional $49,741 |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional $49,640 |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional $49,627 |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional $49,526 |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional $49,482 |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional $49,463 |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional $49,448 |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.8 /100 | #69 | Exceptional $49,412 |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #70 | Exceptional $49,316 |
Greeks | 99.8 /100 | #71 | Exceptional $49,309 |
Immigrants | Hungary | 99.8 /100 | #72 | Exceptional $49,303 |
Immigrants | North America | 99.8 /100 | #73 | Exceptional $49,302 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
Inupiat | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic $36,999 |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $36,849 |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $36,823 |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $36,690 |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $36,665 |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $36,651 |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $36,631 |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic $36,475 |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic $36,427 |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic $36,180 |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic $36,112 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic $35,999 |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic $35,922 |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic $35,897 |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic $35,720 |