Immigrants from Asia vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 549,218,317 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098 and weighted average of $49,741. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475, a difference of 36.4%.

Per Capita Income Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Asia	Chickasaw
Minimum	$13,219	$10,758
Maximum	$90,491	$42,047
Range	$77,273	$31,289
Mean	$51,284	$28,009
Median	$52,258	$27,826
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	$43,660	$24,362
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	$58,564	$31,977
Interquartile Range (IQR)	$14,904	$7,616
Standard Deviation (Sample)	$13,798	$5,659
Standard Deviation (Population)	$13,734	$5,624

Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Asia by Per Capita Income

In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Maltese ($49,640, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Argentina ($49,627, a difference of 0.23%), Argentinean ($49,862, a difference of 0.24%), Bhutanese ($49,894, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Scotland ($49,893, a difference of 0.31%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Per Capita Income
Immigrants \| Western Europe	99.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional $50,065
Asians	99.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional $50,057
South Africans	99.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional $50,044
Immigrants \| Malaysia	99.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional $49,983
Bhutanese	99.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional $49,894
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.9 /100 \| #60	Exceptional $49,893
Argentineans	99.9 /100 \| #61	Exceptional $49,862
Immigrants \| Asia	99.9 /100 \| #62	Exceptional $49,741
Maltese	99.9 /100 \| #63	Exceptional $49,640
Immigrants \| Argentina	99.9 /100 \| #64	Exceptional $49,627
Bolivians	99.9 /100 \| #65	Exceptional $49,526
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	99.9 /100 \| #66	Exceptional $49,482
Immigrants \| Romania	99.9 /100 \| #67	Exceptional $49,463
Lithuanians	99.8 /100 \| #68	Exceptional $49,448
Immigrants \| Canada	99.8 /100 \| #69	Exceptional $49,412

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Per Capita Income

In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Per Capita Income
Inupiat	0.1 /100 \| #305	Tragic $36,999
Immigrants \| Haiti	0.0 /100 \| #306	Tragic $36,849
Immigrants \| Latin America	0.0 /100 \| #307	Tragic $36,823
Fijians	0.0 /100 \| #308	Tragic $36,690
Immigrants \| Honduras	0.0 /100 \| #309	Tragic $36,665
Ute	0.0 /100 \| #310	Tragic $36,651
Chippewa	0.0 /100 \| #311	Tragic $36,631
Chickasaw	0.0 /100 \| #312	Tragic $36,475
Bahamians	0.0 /100 \| #313	Tragic $36,427
Seminole	0.0 /100 \| #314	Tragic $36,180
Yaqui	0.0 /100 \| #315	Tragic $36,112
Choctaw	0.0 /100 \| #316	Tragic $35,999
Dutch West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #317	Tragic $35,922
Bangladeshis	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic $35,897
Immigrants \| Congo	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic $35,720