South American vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income
COMPARE
South American
Chickasaw
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
South Americans
Chickasaw
$44,114
PER CAPITA INCOME
62.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
$36,475
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,145,698 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.179 and weighted average of $44,114. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475, a difference of 20.9%.
Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | $23,579 | $10,758 |
| Maximum | $64,213 | $42,047 |
| Range | $40,635 | $31,289 |
| Mean | $40,955 | $28,009 |
| Median | $41,221 | $27,826 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $34,406 | $24,362 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $46,619 | $31,977 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | $12,213 | $7,616 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | $8,864 | $5,659 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | $8,825 | $5,624 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to South Americans by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Danish ($44,095, a difference of 0.040%), Costa Rican ($44,090, a difference of 0.050%), Swiss ($44,076, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from South America ($44,068, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Nepal ($44,187, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Peruvians | 71.5 /100 | #152 | Good $44,479 |
| Scottish | 70.6 /100 | #153 | Good $44,440 |
| Portuguese | 68.7 /100 | #154 | Good $44,362 |
| Uruguayans | 67.6 /100 | #155 | Good $44,318 |
| Slovaks | 65.4 /100 | #156 | Good $44,229 |
| South American Indians | 64.8 /100 | #157 | Good $44,206 |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 64.3 /100 | #158 | Good $44,187 |
| South Americans | 62.4 /100 | #159 | Good $44,114 |
| Danes | 61.9 /100 | #160 | Good $44,095 |
| Costa Ricans | 61.8 /100 | #161 | Good $44,090 |
| Swiss | 61.4 /100 | #162 | Good $44,076 |
| Immigrants | South America | 61.2 /100 | #163 | Good $44,068 |
| Sri Lankans | 59.8 /100 | #164 | Average $44,014 |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 59.4 /100 | #165 | Average $44,000 |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 59.3 /100 | #166 | Average $43,997 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Inupiat | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic $36,999 |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $36,849 |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $36,823 |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $36,690 |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $36,665 |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $36,651 |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $36,631 |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic $36,475 |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic $36,427 |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic $36,180 |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic $36,112 |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic $35,999 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic $35,922 |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic $35,897 |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic $35,720 |