Chickasaw vs Malaysian Wage/Income Gap
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Malaysian
Wage/Income Gap
Wage/Income Gap Comparison
Chickasaw
Malaysians
27.2%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
3.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.0%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Malaysian Wage/Income Gap Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,661,645 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319 and weighted average of 27.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,066,613 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 25.0%, a difference of 8.5%.
![Chickasaw vs Malaysian Wage/Income Gap](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/wage-income-gap/chickasaw-vs-malaysians-wage-income-gap-chart.webp)
Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Malaysian |
Minimum | 2.8% | 9.0% |
Maximum | 60.4% | 71.7% |
Range | 57.6% | 62.7% |
Mean | 29.3% | 31.3% |
Median | 28.3% | 26.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.5% | 22.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.6% | 38.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.2% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 14.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Wage/Income Gap
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from the Azores (27.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish (27.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (27.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Nonimmigrants (27.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Creek (27.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 4.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 27.1% |
Osage | 4.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 27.1% |
Estonians | 4.3 /100 | #239 | Tragic 27.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 3.8 /100 | #240 | Tragic 27.1% |
Creek | 3.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 27.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 3.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 27.1% |
Spanish | 3.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 27.1% |
Chickasaw | 3.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 3.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 27.2% |
Celtics | 2.8 /100 | #247 | Tragic 27.3% |
Cypriots | 2.8 /100 | #248 | Tragic 27.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 2.7 /100 | #249 | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 2.7 /100 | #250 | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 2.5 /100 | #251 | Tragic 27.3% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Comanche (25.0%, a difference of 0.030%), South American (25.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Iroquois (25.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Chippewa (25.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Peru (25.1%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
Immigrants | Nepal | 89.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 24.9% |
Hawaiians | 89.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 24.9% |
Afghans | 88.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 24.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 88.0 /100 | #143 | Excellent 24.9% |
Chippewa | 86.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 25.0% |
Comanche | 85.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 25.0% |
South Americans | 85.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 25.0% |
Malaysians | 84.9 /100 | #147 | Excellent 25.0% |
Iroquois | 83.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 25.1% |
Immigrants | Peru | 82.6 /100 | #149 | Excellent 25.1% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 82.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 25.1% |
Taiwanese | 81.6 /100 | #151 | Excellent 25.1% |
Uruguayans | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 25.2% |
Blackfeet | 78.1 /100 | #153 | Good 25.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 78.1 /100 | #154 | Good 25.2% |