Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Wage/Income Gap
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Wage/Income Gap
Wage/Income Gap Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
27.2%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
3.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.1%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
3.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Wage/Income Gap Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,661,645 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319 and weighted average of 27.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,684,649 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070 and weighted average of 27.1%, a difference of 0.080%.
Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Sri Lanka |
Minimum | 2.8% | 7.0% |
Maximum | 60.4% | 59.4% |
Range | 57.6% | 52.4% |
Mean | 29.3% | 29.2% |
Median | 28.3% | 28.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.5% | 22.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.6% | 34.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.2% | 11.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from the Azores (27.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish (27.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Nonimmigrants (27.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Creek (27.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Europe (27.1%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Spanish (27.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Creek (27.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Europe (27.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from the Azores (27.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Nonimmigrants (27.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
Immigrants | Brazil | 5.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 4.9 /100 | #234 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 4.8 /100 | #235 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 4.8 /100 | #236 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 4.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 27.1% |
Osage | 4.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 27.1% |
Estonians | 4.3 /100 | #239 | Tragic 27.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 3.8 /100 | #240 | Tragic 27.1% |
Creek | 3.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 27.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 3.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 27.1% |
Spanish | 3.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 27.1% |
Chickasaw | 3.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 3.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 27.2% |
Celtics | 2.8 /100 | #247 | Tragic 27.3% |
Cypriots | 2.8 /100 | #248 | Tragic 27.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 2.7 /100 | #249 | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 2.7 /100 | #250 | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 2.5 /100 | #251 | Tragic 27.3% |
Ukrainians | 2.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 27.3% |
Portuguese | 2.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 27.4% |