Immigrants from Belize Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belize
Select to Compare
Family Households
Immigrants from Belize Family Households
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
92.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belize Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,284,292 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belize and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 64.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belize within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.00% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Belize and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Belize influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Immigrants from Belize simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belize by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belize are Immigrants from Argentina (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Panamanian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Choctaw (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Panama (64.8%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants from Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants from Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants from Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants from Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants from Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
Immigrants from Belize Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belize Data | Family Households Data |
| Minimum | 0.011% | 44.8% |
| Maximum | 6.5% | 79.8% |
| Range | 6.5% | 35.1% |
| Mean | 1.1% | 66.0% |
| Median | 0.83% | 66.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.41% | 61.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.4% | 69.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 6.4% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Belize Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.011% | 58,255,151 | 61.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.035% | 20,402,607 | 64.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.065% | 22,703,402 | 62.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.083% | 6,310,489 | 66.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.11% | 4,556,487 | 67.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 2,585,215 | 67.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.16% | 2,157,932 | 66.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 5,795,240 | 61.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 924,855 | 67.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23% | 1,458,905 | 68.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.26% | 784,121 | 68.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 572,760 | 68.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 327,497 | 71.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 209,681 | 67.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 321,582 | 57.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.38% | 285,795 | 65.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 197,134 | 60.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 220,464 | 65.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 204,607 | 67.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 24,715 | 59.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.50% | 140,660 | 60.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 135,291 | 69.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.55% | 144,361 | 61.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 141,964 | 65.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,176 | 61.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 165,594 | 69.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 93,547 | 71.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 3,267 | 65.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 27,353 | 72.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 59,159 | 67.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 30,784 | 58.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.77% | 42,343 | 58.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 59,697 | 65.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 78,930 | 79.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 89,435 | 67.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 11,824 | 69.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 117,043 | 67.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 66,333 | 69.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 42,990 | 78.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 5,765 | 61.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 6,710 | 68.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 110,279 | 68.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 7,585 | 77.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 69,064 | 74.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.16% | 47,309 | 60.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 5,200 | 63.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 13,022 | 66.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.30% | 13,698 | 61.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 13,910 | 44.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 15,380 | 58.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 11,453 | 75.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 14,679 | 61.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.51% | 861 | 67.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.58% | 49,898 | 65.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 8,225 | 66.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.65% | 15,132 | 60.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 29,307 | 65.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 44,461 | 60.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 1,489 | 56.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 2,582 | 78.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 8,134 | 73.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 1,033 | 55.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 33,528 | 75.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.70% | 408 | 55.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.85% | 1,932 | 63.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.44% | 834 | 76.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.87% | 1,129 | 76.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.48% | 895 | 71.1% |