Immigrants from Afghanistan Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Select to Compare
Family Households
Immigrants from Afghanistan Family Households
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Afghanistan Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,637,809 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.331 and weighted average of 65.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Afghanistan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.3% in percentage of family households.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Afghanistan influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Immigrants from Afghanistan simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants from Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants from Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants from the Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants from South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants from Afghanistan Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Afghanistan Data | Family Households Data |
Minimum | 0.029% | 42.3% |
Maximum | 11.4% | 85.6% |
Range | 11.4% | 43.4% |
Mean | 2.5% | 65.1% |
Median | 2.1% | 66.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.93% | 60.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 70.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 8.7% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Afghanistan Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.029% | 75,099,764 | 60.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.083% | 28,197,574 | 63.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 12,728,031 | 64.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.20% | 5,324,337 | 66.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 5,074,905 | 64.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 3,219,570 | 66.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.37% | 2,335,845 | 68.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 2,143,369 | 64.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49% | 1,393,837 | 70.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 1,602,109 | 70.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 786,414 | 72.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 785,853 | 66.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 854,084 | 65.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.77% | 918,249 | 68.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 926,389 | 69.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 276,819 | 62.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 694,275 | 72.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 526,494 | 69.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 580,772 | 61.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 370,112 | 69.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18% | 574,334 | 71.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 194,636 | 64.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.30% | 301,238 | 71.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 177,016 | 76.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 182,752 | 71.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 156,284 | 66.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.52% | 162,757 | 68.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 158,976 | 73.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 149,493 | 75.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 157,625 | 80.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 153,547 | 71.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.78% | 96,788 | 71.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.91% | 161,077 | 67.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.08% | 127,855 | 55.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 86,101 | 63.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 29,846 | 59.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 90,052 | 71.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.40% | 5,416 | 82.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 36,335 | 55.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.55% | 63,715 | 60.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 51,346 | 67.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 1,620 | 64.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 58,550 | 51.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.85% | 45,296 | 85.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 23,756 | 57.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.97% | 19,531 | 47.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 35,458 | 70.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 1,936 | 69.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 50,028 | 69.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.42% | 3,303 | 51.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.48% | 10,400 | 63.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.55% | 18,080 | 78.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 3,085 | 49.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.73% | 7,770 | 72.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 39,126 | 59.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.85% | 12,840 | 56.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.23% | 37,635 | 70.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 63,907 | 63.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 16,050 | 68.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.69% | 37,310 | 45.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.93% | 345 | 44.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 24,785 | 52.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.47% | 96,076 | 58.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.95% | 34,082 | 42.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.90% | 37,436 | 57.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.42% | 1,200 | 65.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.43% | 2,213 | 64.7% |