Mexican American Indian Family Households
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Select to Compare
Family Households
Mexican American Indian Family Households
67.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,495,580 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.378 and weighted average of 67.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.37% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Mexican American Indians and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Mexican American Indians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Mexican American Indians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from El Salvador (67.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Tsimshian (67.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Peruvian (67.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Tohono O'odham (67.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Salvadoran (67.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants from Latin America | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Nepalese | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Peruvians | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Mexican American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 67.0% |
Immigrants from El Salvador | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 67.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 66.6% |
Immigrants from Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 66.6% |
Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Apache | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Mexican American Indian Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican American Indian Data | Family Households Data |
Minimum | 0.10% | 41.6% |
Maximum | 48.8% | 85.0% |
Range | 48.7% | 43.4% |
Mean | 10.1% | 66.1% |
Median | 7.6% | 67.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 62.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 71.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 9.0% |
Correlation Details
Mexican American Indian Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 197,443,403 | 62.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.37% | 63,752,588 | 66.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 28,044,165 | 66.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 13,576,728 | 70.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 5,319,694 | 69.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 2,946,122 | 69.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 2,385,609 | 71.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 1,217,175 | 73.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 920,642 | 71.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.39% | 493,458 | 68.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 328,283 | 65.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 113,787 | 71.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 331,240 | 81.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.42% | 123,077 | 64.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 104,379 | 63.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.99% | 103,191 | 57.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 19,319 | 75.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.43% | 30,504 | 68.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.76% | 22,457 | 72.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.93% | 14,373 | 66.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.19% | 37,213 | 78.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.53% | 14,099 | 69.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.72% | 2,762 | 60.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.91% | 18,079 | 67.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.28% | 13,419 | 64.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.45% | 11,493 | 69.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.80% | 8,370 | 62.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.09% | 24,129 | 66.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 5,246 | 77.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.49% | 2,909 | 72.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.79% | 9,657 | 62.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.01% | 9,363 | 66.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 6,274 | 67.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 2,655 | 62.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.02% | 5,409 | 55.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.33% | 3,816 | 71.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.46% | 2,220 | 71.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80% | 1,817 | 67.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.05% | 4,526 | 63.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.56% | 322 | 43.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.28% | 727 | 77.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.64% | 507 | 60.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.88% | 2,777 | 56.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.15% | 650 | 69.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.48% | 2,756 | 74.9% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.71% | 118 | 50.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.17% | 3,242 | 72.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.47% | 159 | 82.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.65% | 1,438 | 57.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.93% | 1,036 | 64.9% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.14% | 3,129 | 66.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.96% | 112 | 63.5% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.70% | 2,650 | 72.4% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.22% | 54 | 46.4% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.11% | 180 | 61.0% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.33% | 938 | 70.9% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.57% | 196 | 44.6% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.58% | 95 | 85.0% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.41% | 590 | 41.6% |
[ 48.5% - 49.0% ] 48.82% | 254 | 50.0% |