Houma vs New Zealander Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Houma
New Zealander
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Houma
New Zealanders
18.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
79.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs New Zealander Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,789,508 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 18.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,896,274 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.603 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 70.5%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 10.2% | 0.65% |
| Maximum | 57.5% | 46.3% |
| Range | 47.3% | 45.6% |
| Mean | 21.7% | 14.5% |
| Median | 17.1% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.1% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.3% | 10.4% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Houma by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Lumbee (17.6%, a difference of 5.9%), Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 7.7%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 10.3%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 11.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Syrian (11.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Ukrainian (11.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Cameroon (10.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from England (11.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Canada (11.0%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Lithuanians | 88.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 85.6 /100 | #145 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 83.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 83.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Arabs | 82.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 81.1 /100 | #149 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Syrians | 79.8 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| New Zealanders | 79.3 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Ukrainians | 78.0 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 77.4 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Moroccans | 76.4 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 76.2 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Guyanese | 75.1 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | North America | 74.9 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |