Houma vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Houma
 Pima
 Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Houma
Pima
18.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Pima Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,789,508 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 18.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 15.8%.
 
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma | Pima | 
| Minimum | 10.2% | 8.6% | 
| Maximum | 57.5% | 44.5% | 
| Range | 47.3% | 35.9% | 
| Mean | 21.7% | 19.9% | 
| Median | 17.1% | 18.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 13.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.1% | 25.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 11.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 8.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.3% | 8.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Houma and Pima by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Lumbee (17.6%, a difference of 5.9%), Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 7.7%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 10.3%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 11.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 15.3%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 15.5%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 15.5%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 15.6%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 15.7%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 15.8%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 15.8%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 15.9%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 15.9%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 15.9%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 16.1%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 16.1%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 16.4%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 16.7%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 16.7%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 16.9%  | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 16.9%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 17.4%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 17.6%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347  | Tragic 18.7%  |