Chinese vs Brazilian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Chinese
Brazilian
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Chinese
Brazilians
10.3%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Brazilian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188 and weighted average of 10.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,696,465 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 1.9%.

Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Brazilian |
Minimum | 4.2% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 33.9% | 51.9% |
Range | 29.7% | 50.2% |
Mean | 12.1% | 11.6% |
Median | 10.8% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 12.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Brazilians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Italy (10.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Denmark (10.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (10.3%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Tongan (10.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Korean (10.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (10.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and Ethiopian (10.5%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chinese | 98.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 98.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Palestinians | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Austria | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Macedonians | 97.8 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 97.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Zimbabweans | 97.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Ethiopians | 97.4 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 97.2 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Brazilians | 96.9 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 96.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Tongans | 96.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.5% |