Chinese vs Native/Alaskan Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Chinese
Native/Alaskan
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Chinese
Natives/Alaskans
10.3%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Native/Alaskan Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188 and weighted average of 10.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,516,181 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.118 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 48.7%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Native/Alaskan |
Minimum | 4.2% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 33.9% | 36.2% |
Range | 29.7% | 31.0% |
Mean | 12.1% | 20.1% |
Median | 10.8% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 23.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Italy (10.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Denmark (10.3%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chinese | 98.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 98.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Palestinians | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Pueblo (15.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Cajun (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Cherokee (15.5%, a difference of 0.95%), Navajo (15.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and Arapaho (15.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 14.7% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 14.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.9% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.0% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |