Samoan vs Japanese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Samoan
Japanese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Samoans
Japanese
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Japanese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,059,815 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,121,214 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.010%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Samoan | Japanese |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.93% |
Maximum | 18.6% | 18.5% |
Range | 17.1% | 17.6% |
Mean | 7.0% | 7.5% |
Median | 6.3% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Japanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Yugoslavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |