Samoan vs Immigrants from Congo Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Samoan
Immigrants from Congo
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Samoans
Immigrants from Congo
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
18.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Immigrants from Congo Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,059,815 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,115,389 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.158 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.63%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Samoan | Immigrants from Congo |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.17% |
Maximum | 18.6% | 12.2% |
Range | 17.1% | 12.0% |
Mean | 7.0% | 6.1% |
Median | 6.3% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 6.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Immigrants from Congo by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Immigrants from Ukraine (6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |