Samoan vs Immigrants from Ukraine Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Samoan
Immigrants from Ukraine
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Samoans
Immigrants from Ukraine
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
18.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Immigrants from Ukraine Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,059,815 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 289,659,329 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ukraine and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.915 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.65%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Samoan | Immigrants from Ukraine |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 18.6% | 88.9% |
| Range | 17.1% | 87.4% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 8.9% |
| Median | 6.3% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Immigrants from Ukraine by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ukraine are Immigrants from Congo (6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |