Belgian vs Japanese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Belgian
Japanese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Belgians
Japanese
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
28.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Belgian vs Japanese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,928,519 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Belgians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,121,214 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Belgian | Japanese |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.93% |
Maximum | 16.4% | 18.5% |
Range | 15.1% | 17.6% |
Mean | 6.6% | 7.5% |
Median | 6.3% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Belgians and Japanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Belgians are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (6.2%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |