Samoan vs Alsatian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Samoan
Alsatian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Samoans
Alsatians
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
15.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Alsatian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,059,815 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,679,981 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.33%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Samoan | Alsatian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.97% |
| Maximum | 18.6% | 29.2% |
| Range | 17.1% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 7.7% |
| Median | 6.3% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Alsatians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Bangladeshi (6.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |