Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Japanese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Japanese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Japanese
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Japanese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,510,765 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,121,214 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 17.2%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Japanese |
Minimum | 0.17% | 0.93% |
Maximum | 8.4% | 18.5% |
Range | 8.2% | 17.6% |
Mean | 4.9% | 7.5% |
Median | 4.9% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 3.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |